Make your own free website on Tripod.com
UCC comerical lien process

Filing court motions information

Home | documents filed and illegally rejected | communication with court | Motions | Other motions | More Motions | Top issues | What about these? | Filing court motions information | New information Must read 10/20/06

To: The law offices of Jane O’Donnell, Jane O’Donnell and

       GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

       30242 Esperanza Suite 150

       P.O. Box 80034

       Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

       Regarding: UCC financial statement

 

10.09.06

 

                        In receipt of your letter regarding the termination of U. C. C. Financial filing statement, your demand is formally denied.  If you’re unsure about the process and how it works please consult an attorney who may be able to counsel and provide additional information regarding this process. 

 

                        It is also my duty to inform you that according to the documents that you have in your possession as representatives of Great West life insurance and annuity company, you were warned in advance that any attempts to retaliate or intimidate or threaten, would result in a $100,000,000.00 claimed for each infraction.  The count now stands at six infractions totaling $600,000,000.00; a uniform commercial code financial filing statement will be the filed against yourself, your company, along with the great was life insurance company.  Your attempts slander my name, to accuse me of criminal wrong doing, and your ignorance and stupidity leave me no choice. 

 

 

                        I truly hope this resolves this issue

 

 

                                                                           X______________________________

                                                                                        Rftsjm  srtjrtyu
 

To: Sherri R. Carter, Ralph Zaresky, Sheila English, Judy (Judie) A. Mathews, Estrella Tamayo, Denise R. Johnson, Terry J. Hatter Jr., Alicemarie H. Stotler, and Doe’s 1-50, ect...al..,

       uNITED States COURTHOUSE

       uNITED States FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

       Los Angeles, Ca 90012

 

       Regarding: UCC financial statement

 

10.09.06

 

                        In receipt of your letter regarding the regarding the Commercial Lien, Criminal Complaint, and Affidavit you did not respond to any of the point listed in the Commercial Lien, Criminal Complaint, and Affidavit. If you’re unsure about the process and how it works please consult an attorney they may be able to counsel and provide additional information regarding this process. 

 

                        It is also my duty to inform you that according to the documents that you Sherri R. Carter, Ralph Zaresky, Sheila English, Judy (Judie) A. Mathews, Estrella Tamayo, Denise R. Johnson, Terry J. Hatter Jr., Alicemarie H. Stotler, and Doe’s 1-50, ect...al.., you were warned in advance that noticed to agent is notice to principal, returning the documents stamped  received only goes to show your lack of understanding and your ignorance as well as stupidity leave me no choice. Your feeble attempt to delay the process has been duly noted, and you’ll need to review the documents once again because your did one is fast approaching.

 

 

                        I truly hope this resolves this issue

 

 

                                                                           X______________________________

                                                                                        Fhjdf  rtsyushrt  
 
 

 bvnzfg

P.O. zdfh  szdrth

Th , erst sreth

                                     

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Trsjhty

Ty

J

Sdtytynsty

Nsrtynjhm

Ytsjn

rtftyud

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

In addition to the demand

Regarding the termination of U.

C. C. Financial filing statement,

demand formally denied. And

Notice of address change  

 

                

                  In receipt of the Plaintiff’s letter regarding the termination of U. C. C. Financial filing statement, there demand is formally denied.  If they’re unsure about the process and how it works they may consult an attorney who may be able to counsel and provide additional information regarding this process. 

 

            It is also my duty to inform you that according to the documents they have in your possession as representatives of Great West life insurance and annuity company, they were warned in advance that any attempts to retaliate or intimidate or threaten, would result in a $100,000,000.00 claimed for each infraction.  The count now stands at six infractions totaling $600,000,000.00; a uniform commercial code financial filing statement will be the filed against The law offices of Jane O’Donnell, Jane O’Donnell and GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY. There attempts slander my name, to accuse me of criminal wrong doing, and there ignorance as well as stupidity leave me no choice. 

 

            I truly hope this resolves this issue!

 

                      It has already been brought to this court’s attention that the judge presiding over this matter has a UCC financial one statement filed against him and several other members of his court, any rulings, any judgments, any decisions that has been made will be overturned.

 

            The plaintiff have requested a date of October 23 for hearing, I’m sorry but that does not fit within my time schedule, I’m requesting any hearing be scheduled at least three months in advance, 3,400mi. you know. If that seems to be an unreasonable request get back with me.

 

 

                        The plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to the commercial lien acknowledged that they received the documents and that they willingly failed to respond. And there is no document, court filing, certified mail receipt to show that they did attempt to engage in a battle regarding the charges allege by the respondent in the commercial lien

affidavit.

 

                     I have already provided the state of California supreme court case law, the united states supreme court case law, the united states constitutional amendment case law, supporting the fact that “a party must be given notice” . . . well I’ll let you read it for yourself:

 

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.,

 

395 U.S. 337, 349 Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

A CLAIM OF LIEN IS FILE PURSUANT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 2872, 2874, 2875, 2881(1), 2883, and 2889, against Lien Debtor(s) for default and breach of contract under commercial law. Section 3281 of Civil Code for damages sustained. California Government Code 27297.5 and 27387 as an involuntary lien based on consensual actions by knowledgeable breach of contract. UCC 9-401 (a) (3)

 

The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

 

               Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

 

                  Now let’s state the obvious, “only the secured party on the UCC financial one statement form can terminate the filing”

 

                  This is a non-judicial process, it was pre-judicial

 

                  Jury trial has been demanded, filed and accepted by the court, and in support of that document I submit the following attachment entitled “proof of Gate-Keeping”, they contain their own attachments and exhibits.

 

            We have an abuse of discretion, Gate-Keeping, deprivation of due process rights under color and authority of law, mispersion of felony, all violations of secured constitutional rights, but the one and foremost

deprivation is the right to petition my government for redress of GRIEVENCE has been blocked, and or denied my self, the first amendment says Congress “shall make no law prohibiting”, so this is my legal right!

 

            Notice of address change any and all further correspondence must be mailed to the following address Brent Jones, P.O. Box 343, Schenectady, New York, 12301

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                         

                       

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of

the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

The law offices of Jane O’Donnell

Jane O’Donnell and GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: ________________________ Dated:  10/10/06

                                       Jsrytjrtyns srethrst

 

 

Rhthn  eatuhsrt6

Ayhea ry2 Jayaery ryhaer yha

Yry nectaear eardy, eray, 1ear 2ear era 5

                                     

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Rea yeary3513ea

E ar

1yeary1ear 1yh321 h6aeea

 

y145ae5yhae

e

yh4111ea641y

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725-TJH

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

Response

Not untimely

 

                

                  The court requested for documents to be amended in order correct “caption”, each one of the request was responded to in-kind. If a default judgment was requested of this court back in August how is it I have

 

yet to receive such a request copy? And by the way several documents were accepted by the court for filing, one document entitled in part “jury trial request”. It would be interesting to note that that document not only requested it jury trial but listed several allegations against the plaintiffs thereby constituting it a responce, and documents and the counterclaim were re-submitted entitled “Amendment” (the attachment Exhibit A, & B)

 

                  I do not mind playing the word game; I anticipated the court doing what they’ve done thus far, only because that’s their method of operation, I however planned in advance. So the plaintiff’s request for a default judgment is moot and it is demanded emphatically that the default request be denied as there exsist no proof of un-timeliness (the attachment Exhibit A, & B).

 

                  My documents conform to rules of court and was submitted timely, so I submit this request to have this matter readdressed by the presiding judge of this court. Due process requires that this case be given a fair hearing. The documents that were filed and accepted by the court that has the stamped date of August 15, 2006 and was received August 03, 2006 in the same envelope the counterclaim was submitted, which was not filed even though it contained the original signature on the original document (the attachment Exhibit A, & B).

 

 

            We have a problem, that problem is abuse of discretion,

Gate-Keeping, deprivation of due process rights under color and authority of law, mispersion of felony, all violations of secured constitutional rights, but the one and foremost deprivation is the right to petition my government for redress of GRIEVENCE has been blocked, and or denied my self, the first amendment says Congress “shall make no law prohibiting”, so if this is my legal right why are you people interfering with it?

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                         

                       

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of

the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: ________________________ Dated:  09/14/06

                                       Brerah ea ytyh eah

 

 

 

Earry ea yheary

Rh yhear yyaer

Era yryea eay, Near yw York, era yey05

                                     

                        In the uNITED States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Eray

Ae yhaer

Yheryhera

 

Er

Yh

ateea

            Respondent,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

                       Plaintiff,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: CV-06-2725

Motion:  

1ST , 5Th, 6Th, 7th, 8Th, 9Th,

& 10th Amendment Demand

 

Verified

Affidavit Of TRUTH

In addition to

default judgment

request By respondent,

(addendum), response to default request

of and by all adverse parties.

 

                

                  The respondent has been accused of not engaging in the battle, and having failed to respond. And yet the facts showed different, several documents that have been filed with this court, please take special

note of the one demanding for “default judgment, petition for redress demand for jury trial”. Those items were milled on August 01, 2006 you might excuse me, but that appears to be an attempt to engage in the battle. 

 

                     Each of the petitions that were filed with this court and done so timely must be construed as a response. They also contained several points that can be construed as nothing but a response.

 

                      It has already been brought to this court’s attention that the judge presiding over this matter has a UCC financial one statement filed against him and several other members of his court, any rulings, any judgments, any decisions that has been made will be overturned.

 

                      The plaintiff have requested a date of October 23 for hearing, I’m sorry but that does not fit within my time schedule, I’m requesting any hearing be scheduled at least three months in advance, 3,400mi. you know. If that seems to be an unreasonable request get back with me.

 

 

                        The plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to the commercial lien acknowledged that they received the documents and that they willingly failed to respond. And there is no document, court filing, certified mail receipt to show that they did attempt to engage in a battle regarding the charges allege by the respondent in the commercial lien

 

affidavit.

 

                     I have already provided the state of California supreme court case law, the united states supreme court case law, the united states constitutional amendment case law, supporting the fact that “a party must be given notice” . . . well I’ll let you read it for yourself:

 

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.,

 

395 U.S. 337, 349 Supported by the California Supreme Court, 1971, Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 C3d 536, 96 Cal Rptr 709 and 488 P2d

 

A CLAIM OF LIEN IS FILE PURSUANT CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 2872, 2874, 2875, 2881(1), 2883, and 2889, against Lien Debtor(s) for default and breach of contract under commercial law. Section 3281 of Civil Code for damages sustained. California Government Code 27297.5 and 27387 as an involuntary lien based on consensual actions by knowledgeable breach of contract. UCC 9-401 (a) (3)

 

The first amendment of the uNITED States constitution says in part:

 

               Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of grievance.”

 

                  Now let’s state the obvious, “only the secured party on the UCC financial one statement form can terminate the filing”

 

                  This is a non-judicial process, it was pre-judicial

 

                  Jury trial has been demanded, filed and accepted by the court, and in support of that document I submit the following attachment entitled “proof of Gate-Keeping”, they contain their own attachments and exhibits.

 

            We have an abuse of discretion, Gate-Keeping, deprivation of due process rights under color and authority of law, mispersion of felony, all violations of secured constitutional rights, but the one and foremost deprivation is the right to petition my government for redress of GRIEVENCE has been blocked, and or denied my self, the first amendment says Congress “shall make no law prohibiting”, so this is my legal right!

 

                      Certificate of mailing                                                                          

                       

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of

 

the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

 

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

30242 Esperanza Suite 150

P.O. Box 80034

Rancho Sta. Margarita, Ca 92668

 

                 The aforementioned is true and correct and submitted by the CLAIMANT

                               Signed: ________________________ Dated:  10/04/06

                                       Ear yera r ya eae

Enter main content here

Enter secondary content here

Enter secondary content here

Enter supporting content here