Make your own free website on Tripod.com
UCC comerical lien process

What about these?

Home | documents filed and illegally rejected | communication with court | Motions | Other motions | More Motions | Top issues | What about these? | Filing court motions information | New information Must read 10/20/06

 

Brent Jones

 

 

 

              

                        In the uNited States District Court

                        In and for the State of California

 

Brent Jones

            Plaintiff,

      vs.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, Sherri R. Carter, Ralph Zaresky, Sheila English, Judy (Judie) A. Mathews, Estrella Tamayo, Denise R. Johnson, and Doe’s 1-50, ect...al..,

                       Defendant       

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.:

Motion:  

Verified CRIMINAL

Compliant  

 

Affidavit Of TRUTH

                 

 

                 The following is said to be done knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and in an ongoing conspiracy to violate the

rights of Brent Jones (to be known through out complaint as The Complainant). The legal precedent for this matter is the first amendment of the uNITED States Constitution, which states “Congress shall make no law respecting... the right of the people to... petition the government for a redress of

grievances.”

 

                 I am extremely grateful that the uNITED states constitution allows for suit in equity, and at no time does it limit the form in witch a suit maybe prosecuted. I’m also grateful that President George Bush has stated ‘that the constitution affords these rights to all natural born Citizens of the uNITED States.’

                 

                 Since the uNITED States constitution is the supreme law of

the land (Common Law, Bill of Rights 9. 1. No law shall be passed abridging the rights of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government...”), and because under said constitution The Complainant exists as a sovereign citizen (THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE:.. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable [inalienable] Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..), I hereby demand correction of the wrongs perpetrated under color of law (doctors operate under authority of law); a violation of uNITED States criminal code title eighteen section 242 ( 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law- Release date: 2005-08-03: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, .., or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be

sentenced to death.” (as well as other local statutes and Laws).

 

                  This is a verified complaint, as attested to by The Complainant signature. It is demanded and required by due process law that the court employ any and all prescribe procedures for the prosecution of the individuals who perpetrated the offenses contained within this complaint. And because more than one person is known to have participate, conspiracy is further alleged (US CODE: TITLE 18 371, US CODE: TITLE 18 956, US CODE: TITLE 18 956, Common Law , Also Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights. 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law. Amendments as well as other local statutes and Laws)

 

                  It does become necessary to advise this body of the uNITED States constitution’s language, anytime we have the words shall or shall not in reference to any amendment, these word[s] solidifies that amendment so that it cannot be changed. The court is aware that any guaranteed right cannot be denied or withheld from any person, to do such is the abridgement of such rights, and when done under color of law it is a felony (right to liberty, to the pursuit of happiness, to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and deprivations of rights recognized by Common Law and uNITED States constitution (U.S.C.A. 1, 5, 6, 8, 10), and is a felony under the uNITED States criminal law (U.S.C.A. 18 4, 242, 241 as well as other local

statutes and Laws).

 

                             COUNT ONE 

 

                 On or about October 04, 1989 at approximately 10:40 AM The Complainant entered into a contract with doctor Joseph Peters, Doctor Joseph Peters employed to perform corrective eye surgery (to correct a slight wondering eye element). It was to be done by doctor Joseph Peters at the Saint Francis Medical Center, and Doctor Joseph Peters explained that the procedure would take approximately one hour. Doctor Joseph Peters also explained that anesthesia would be involved, The Complainant expressed concerns about being unconscious while someone was working on his person; to which Doctor Joseph Peters said “we will run a test to see which anesthesia would be appropriate for you ‘(The Complainant), so that you won’t be under too long’”.

 

                 Doctor Joseph Peters and The Complainant signed a contract that day agreeing to the aforementioned, however it was only later discovered that Doctor Joseph Peters had no intentions on honoring the said contract. Doctor Joseph Peters and the Saint Francis Medical Center would later recklessly jeopardize the health, safety, and future well-being of The Complainant; by premeditatively Depriving The Complainant of The Complainant’s right to life, liberty, and a pursuit of happiness.

 

                 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees,

staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 1 - 50 did knowingly, deliberately, willingly, and intentionally misled The Complainant, by giving him a false sense of security, as Doctor Joseph Peters’ Hippocratic oath “to do no harm” and the contract entered into with The Complainant was not honored. His actions were deliberate, and premeditated, and did lead to the senseless murder of The Complainant. Violating The Complainant’s 1St, 4Th, 5Th, 8Th, and due process amendment rights, along with other state, local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             COUNT TWO

 

                 On or about December 04, 1989 The Complainant Arrive at the Saint Francis Medical Center (The Daughters of Charity National Health (Ascension Health)), and once again entered into a contract, admitting The Complainant to the care of that facility. He made several requests of Doe’s 1 – 5 about the tests that were to be run regarding anesthesia, to which The Complainant was told “You’ll have to wait to speak with doctor Peters when he arrives”. The Complainant upon meeting with doctor Joseph Peters inquired about the test that was to be run concerning the anesthesia, at which time Doctor Joseph Peters explained “I forgot to order the test, and we don’t have time to do it this morning, however we use this anesthesia all the time, and

haven’t had any problems with our other patients…” (The Complainant is a control person, and did not feel to comfortable being unconscious and not in control of what was being done to The Complainant, having no knowledge of

 

what was going on, at the moment that it was occurring).

 

                 Unlike The Complainant, GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 1 - 50 were fully aware that as with all drugs some patients run the risk of an allergic reaction, yet Doctor Joseph Peters proceeded without caution. Doctor Joseph Peters actions were reckless, vindictive, malicious, and ill responsible. When The Complainant continued to express concerns about anesthesia, as having never been exposed to a general anesthetic in the past; Doctor Joseph Peters gave a false sense of security to The Complainant, all for financial gain (the money from insurance carrier). Doctor Joseph Peters, The Daughters of Charity National Health (Ascension Health), the Saint Francis Medical Center did violate The Complainant right to liberty, to life, to happiness, as well as other secured guaranteed rights of the uNITED States Constitution, violating The Complainant’s 1St, 4Th, 5Th, 8Th, and due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count Three

 

                 On or about December 04, 1989 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST,

Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 1 - 5 did knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, and then an ongoing conspiracy conspired to violate the rights of The Complainant, GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 1 - 5 did knowingly and premeditatively deprive The Complainant of The Complainant’s life. By committing murder, a violation of the uNITED States Constitution, the right to life, the right to happiness, and the right to liberty. During an operation The Complainant became conscious, instead of halting the procedure The Complainant powerless and paralyzed awoke in fear. Only to hear doctor Joseph Peters saying to Doe 6, “something’s wrong”. At which point Doe 6 said “what do you mean something’s wrong?” To which doctor Joseph Peters said “something’s wrong his awake!” Then Doe 6 stated “what do you mean he’s awake”, doctor Joseph Peters stated “he’s awake, look his eyes are moving” at which point Doe 6 leaned over across the forehead of The Complainant and said “oh?” he proceeded to administer a lethal dose of anesthesia. Instead of Halting the procedure GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 5 – 12, administered a lethal dose of anesthesia to The Complainant, killing The Complainant.

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 1 - 5 did violate The Complainant right to liberty, to life, to happiness, as well as other secured guaranteed rights of the uNITED States Constitution, violating The Complainant’s 1St, 4Th, 5Th, 8Th, due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count Four

 

                 One or about December 04, 1989 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 6 -12 did knowingly, willingly, deliberately, and intentionally in an on going conspiracy conspired to violate the rights of The Complainant, subjecting him to a foreign poisonous substance, in their attempts to bring him back to life. The Complainant having been clinically dead for more than fifteen minutes the accused injected a poisonous substance to bring The Complainant back to life. The side effects of that experimental poisonous substance were unknown at the time. Upon restoring the vital signs of The Complainant no one gave consideration to the long term effects and or damage done as a result of the high body temperature (126), the more than

eighteen minutes of clinical death, the very hazardous and poisonous experimental drug, the internal damage, the brain damage, and the emotional damage as a result of the actions of the accused. By doing so GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 6-12 did violate The Complainant right to liberty, to life, to happiness, as well as other secured guaranteed rights of the uNITED States Constitution, violating The Complainant’s 1St,4Th, 5Th, 8Th, due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count Five

 

                 On or about December 04, 1989 due to GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 6-19 recklessness, did knowingly, premeditatively, willingly, deliberately, and intentionally Caused damage to all the vital organs of The Complainant; by their actions or lack thereof. By inducing anesthesia, and then giving an overdose, the accused caused a chemical reaction in The Complainant’s body, which led to a spike in body temperature (126F unprecedented at the time). Failing to notice the equipment in place to monitor The Complainant’s vital signs, i.e.: rising temperature; GREAT-WEST

LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy Doe’s 6-19 knowingly participated in the actions that led to the death of The Complainant.

               

                 In allowing the temperature the rise above 126 Doctor Joseph Peters, The Daughters of Charity National Health (Ascension Health), the Saint Francis Medical Center in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 6-19, were fully aware that brain damage would ensue, that there would be damage to the vital organs, (such as liver, kidney, intestines, colon, heart, lungs, and eyes). Doctor Joseph Peters, the Saint Francis Medical Center and Doe’s 6-19 made no preparations, or plans for the long term care of The Complainant. Because of their active malfeasance, and their failure to adhere to the contract, GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 6-19, did knowingly, willingly, intentionally, deliberately and an ongoing conspiracy violate The Complainant’s uNITED States’ Constitutionally secured rights to liberty, to life, to happiness, violating The Complainant’s 1St,4Th ,5Th ,8Th , due process amendment rights, as well as other secured guaranteed rights of the uNITED States Constitution along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count six

                   

                 On or about December 04, 1989 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 11 – 30, did knowingly, willingly, premeditatively, intentionally, deliberately, and in an ongoing conspiracy, conspire to cover up the premeditated murder of The Complainant. Originally telling The Complainant’s family ‘that The Complainant was dead, and that they needed to come claim the body’(by way of tele-communication). Placing The Complainant’s family through undue stress, pain, anguish, along with frustration, and only after being put through such torture, waited until The Complainant’s family arrived at the Saint Francis Medical Center, to be informed ‘that The Complainant was no longer dead. That The Complainant had been brought back to life, but would probably be a vegetable, due to the incompetence that resulted in brain damage’. By doing so Doctor Joseph Peters, GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 11-30 did violate The Complainant right to liberty, to life, to happiness, all secured

guaranteed rights of the uNITED States Constitution, violating The Complainant’s 1St,4Th ,5Th ,8Th , due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the

union.

 

                             Count Seven

 

                 On or about December 6 1989, Doctor Joseph Peters, The Daughters of Charity National Health (Ascension Health), the Saint Francis Medical Center in an ongoing conspiracy with Doe’s 19 - 44, did knowingly, willingly, premeditatively, intentionally, deliberately, and in an ongoing conspiracy, cause the irreparable damage to The Complainant’s kidney, liver, brain, upper and lower intestines, heart, lungs, colon, eye’s, nervous system, and other essential bodily mechanisms essential for the proper function of The Complainant’s physical vessel. Since the date of their unethical decisions, incompetence, intentional effort to cause harm, lack of intent to redress their wrongs; The Complainant has continued to experience elevated liver enzymes, digestive dysfunction, irregular heart beat, colon enlargement, debilitating migraines, blurred vision, spotted vision, uncontrolled eye movement, memory loss, personality disintegration, loss of the ability to reason, along with other document medical complications.

 

                 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its

employees, staff, interns, and technicians, received compensation for their services, thereby documenting their culpability, their willing participation, their deliberate attempts and an ongoing conspiracy to cover up their wrongs,

having at no time compensated The Complainant for ongoing medical treatment as was promised, and partially documented in original contract between The Complainant and the above listed Respondents / Conspirators; and by doing so did knowingly, willingly, deliberately, premeditatively, and in an active ongoing conspiracy conspired to deprive The Complainant of his constitutionally secured right to life, to the active pursuit of happiness, to be free from cruel, torture and unusual punishment. To be justly compensated for wrongs perpetuated upon The Complainant. Violating The Complainant’s 1St,4Th ,5Th ,8Th , due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count Eight

 

                 On or about January 16 1990 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, did knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, premeditatively in an ongoing conspiracy conspired to commit fraud against The Complainant and The Complainant’s health insurance company; by stating that ‘there had been an unforeseen complications during the operation, that was the result not of “doctor’s error”, but the result of an unanticipated event.’

 

                 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY

OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians.had been repeatedly asked by The Complainant to run a test to determine ‘the compatibility of the anesthesia’, and although assurances were given that these tests would be run no such tests was administered, GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians statements, and comments to the contrary was an act of fraud, thereby breaching the contract entered into with The Complainant. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, premeditatively, and in an ongoing conspiracy violate The Complainant’s 1St,4Th ,5Th ,8Th , due process amendment rights, along with other state local and federal laws as is cognizable by every state and court of the union.

 

                             Count Nine

 

                        Susie (Susan) Coane, but Ralph Zarefsky, Terrie (Terry) Baker, Judie (Judy) Mathews, Esteria Tamayo, Denise Johnson did knowingly, willingly, deliberately, intentionally, premeditatively in an ongoing conspiracy conspired to commit fraud against The Complainant and Participated in an ongoing companies using to deny the complainant access to courts. Blocking access to the court is a violation of the united states constitution which guarantees access to courts. And also violates the first amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. And is also recognized as Misperson of felony, a criminal offense under united states constitutional amendments title eighteen section four. Each of the aforementioned is said to have done this in there official as well as individual capacity, thereby violating another Federal law; title eighteen of the united states constitution amendment subsection 241 and 242.

 

                        The first amendment of the uNITED STATES constitution permits, allows for suit in equity, and because California is still a common law state it is a under common law that I introduce this petition. To jeopardize the health and safety of another is a criminal act, and the above is documented in medical records, describing the intentional, willful, and deliberate intent to cause harm to The Complainant.

 

                         The Complainant since the date of the injury has had a morbid fear of hospitals, and doctors. The Complainant remains in constant fear of getting into an accident, whereby The Complainant might be unconscious; as The Complainant’s doctors never informed him of the

particular anesthetic that The Complainant is allergic to, he might be subject to the very same experience of the pass, and this time he more than likely will not survive.

 

                         Constant abdominal pain, coupled with the higher enzyme levels in the liver, the massive migraines that are extremely debilitating, the blurred vision, the spots in the vision, the scars left on the eye, the kidney pain that remains constant, the memory loss, dizziness, the extreme fatigue, the inability to sleep, the lack of sensation in certain areas of the body, the lack of stamina, the inability to focus, the inability to maintain employment, friendships, relationships, all as a result of what took place December 04, 1989 as a result of the actions of GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, who authorize the complete payment of the medical bill they’re by accepting partial responsibility. As the insurance carrier at no time did any type of investigation, paying off two million dollars. For over fifteen

years I’ve continued to suffer as a result of the actions of the accused GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians.

 

                       Fifteen years of torture, with no form of relief, constantly bringing to the attention of the accused GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, as

well as the courts only to be ignored. I have constantly sought in good faith to resolve the issue of restitution and continued medical treatment, only to have such good faith efforts go completely ignored by GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians.

 

                         The fact that on October 28, 1998 The Complainant for the first time in over seven years remember quite a few things in The Complainant’s past. That prior to this The Complainant did not remember The Complainant family, The Complainant did not remember growing up, (The Complainant knew personalities, faces, however no details), the anguish and frustration this caused cannot be expressed without using expletive, of which The Complainant never resort.

 

                         Of how every time The Complainant goes to see a doctor and the complaints about the continual blood in his stool, they

suspected that he has colon cancer. At one time being diagnosed with such cancer, only to be told they could not be explained why The Complainant no longer had colon cancer. The Complainant finally realizing that it has to be the result of the abdominal pain, that The Complainant is bleeding along his intestines and digestive tract.

 

                         The Complainant because of the fatigue and lack of stamina was diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, taking a regimen of

vitamin B. twelve along with major dietary changes, has proven effective. The lack of taste well eating food is almost nonexistent, The Complainant literally adding to his foods condiments and spices just to achieve some sense of taste. Each and every leaf vegetable taste exactly the same, in an experiment The Complainant chewed paper the notice that there was no difference in its taste and the taste of most of the foods he was ingesting. (Food is supposed to be enjoyable, but tastes are supposed to be varying, yet unique. I no longer gain any such satisfaction, as my taste buds were fried during that botched operation).

 

                         I would suspect very few people know what it feels like to be a young man who is not able to even remember his mother, sisters and brothers, or many of the friends he once had, The Complainant knows exactly what that feels like, and it’s time that those who helped The Complainant to gain this experience, be helped to appreciate the value of

their assistance.

 

                         Unable to afford counsel to represent to bring a lawsuit against the accused Perpetrators of these crimes, and a lack of ability to focus, concentrate, and deal with the pressures of filing a lawsuit pro se’ The Complainant filed a criminal complaint in the district court of southern California, and continues to have access to the court blocked, and denied.

 

                         The remedy was to seek redress by means of a mechanism used by the Federal government against every day citizens, the (commercial) lien process.

 

                         The Complainant hereby informs the court that The Complainant formally demands redress as afforded by the first amendment of the uNITED States constitution for the wrongs committed against The Complainant. Damage awards are requested as follows:

 

1.    GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, Susie (Susan) Coane, but Ralph Zarefsky, Terrie (Terry) Baker, Judie (Judy) Mathews, Estrella

    Tamayo, Denise Johnson and Doe’s 1-50, its     

    employees, staff, interns, and technicians, pay

    compensatory damages in the amount of five    

    Billion Six Hundred Million Dollars.

 

2.    GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, Susie (Susan) Coane, but Ralph Zarefsky, Terrie (Terry) Baker, Judie (Judy) Mathews, Esteria Tamayo, Denise Johnson and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, pay punitive damages in the amount of Seven Hundred Million Dollars.

    

                       The figures are not excessive, but are a good faith value of how The Complainant equates 365 days times 15 years, totaling 5,479 days (Including leap year) of suffering, of pain, of no relief, not to

mention the expected future suffering, and future health complications. The Complainant valued The Complainant’s health then, and do so now, and the value The Complainant places on The Complainant’s right to life, to liberty (To be free from all harm and constraints, whether it is prison or pain), and the pursuit of happiness. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL PROVINCE OF THE WEST, Saint Francis Medical Center, PERCEPTION EYE CENTER MEDICAL CLINIC, INC, Joseph C. Peters, and Doe’s 1-50, its employees, staff, interns, and technicians, interfered with my rights, those very same rights pres. George Bush says all natural born citizen are entitled to.

 

                        We hold these truths to be self evident “That all men are created equal”, the so called founding fathers didn’t make those words up, for at acts 10: 34,35 “Jehovah is not partial... in every nation the

man.. is acceptable to him”. It is uniquely nice to know that our founding fathers recognized the sovereignty of every man, and as a sovereign citizen of the uNITED States, the constitution makes it against the law, a criminal act to harm a sovereign citizen.

 

                        Attempts to convert this petition to a civil action will not be allowed, anyone involved in such an attempt will be also added to a UCC financial filings statement. I state clearly that the uniform commercial code division under the Secretary of the state of California, Is this section of government this petitioner will seek to redress such issues.

 

                  By the way the plaintiffs have filed with the government their petition for redress of GRIEVENCE (a civil lawsuit) asking the government to correct the wrongs they allege having been done them. If the court allows the suit to proceed they can not under law of due process and equal protection invalidate in any form, fashion, or way the respondents petitioning of the government through uniform commercial code his redress of grievance.

 

                          I request for the court to issue any and all remedies in addition to the aforementioned to affect justice.

 

                         Certificate of mailing                                                                          

                        

                         The aforementioned is true and correct and a copy of the aforementioned has been mailed via U.S. postal service to:

 

uNITED States Federal District Court

312 N. Spring Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Enter main content here

Enter secondary content here

Enter supporting content here